Quivering Daughters. by Dean Gotcher

"Quivering Daughters."
"the children of disobedience"

"And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them. And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honourable." Isaiah 3:4, 5

Dean Gotcher

    The "quivering daughters" of today are the "children of disobedience" who are in love with their flesh more than they are in love with the Word of the Lord (using the Word of God only for their own desired outcome, justifying themselves, i.e. their carnal nature, i.e. their hate of Godly authority over men i.e. misapplying the scriptures so as to justify themselves before themselves and men), "quivering" because of their love of permissiveness (sensuousness) and their contempt for chastening (righteousness). Dad and mom are not perfect but their office (which is given to them by God) is. Jesus made it very clear (for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear) that if you do not honor your father and mother (honor the office of authority that He gave them to rule within) you can not worship His Father. Therefore "the children of disobedience" of today are the "quivering daughters" of the future who are left out in the cold (or rather in hell) because they did not come prepared for the wedding feast, foolishly coming unprepared, having centered their attention upon themselves, i.e. upon their sensuousness, i.e. upon their love of the pleasures of this world, i.e. upon the approval of men (which they get plenty of as they attack the chastening of the father, making God's will subject to their will, i.e. man's will, thereby tempting―attempting to seduce Him to join them in their sensuousness to justify their foolishness, i.e. tempting Him to be tolerant of their permissiveness, i.e. to take part in their unrighteousness, i.e. their unrighteous thoughts and their unrighteous actions) rather than upon the Lord, i.e. upon His righteousness, doing His Fathers will, even to the death.
    We are to have the mind of Christ, "Not my will, but thy will be done." But today, instead of having the mind of which is of Christ, i.e. "Thy will be done on earth, as it is in heaven," "Contemporary Christians" have the mind of the Devil, "as above, so below" (which is of the Devils bible), making god and man one in sensuousness. This is the mind of antichrist, i.e. the mind of Satan.   The moment you filter God's word, i.e. His righteousness, through your mind of sensuousness, through "self-justification" (the dialectic tool of philosophy, psychology, sociology, anthropology, etc), you are of the spirit of antichrist, i.e. where the "wrath of God upon the children of disobedience" and "God chastening those he loves" is "sense perceives," by sensuous man, as being "spiritual abuse." Instead of fearing their earthly father (honoring him), they see him as the agent of "abuse," as physically, mentally, and socially ("spiritually") "abusing" them. They should be fearful of the Heavenly Father, who not only will physically, mentally, and socially "abuse" them (kill them for their sins) but will also casts them into hell.
    I am not condoning parents who torture their children, who take pleasure in their children's pain, or who hate their children, or who are totally into themselves. But chastening the child (not letting them have what they want and bringing pain into their lives to bring them out of the love of sensuousness and back to the love of righteousness, i.e. doing what is right according to parental standards) does not destroy the child, even though it is grievous for a season (for a time). Socialist always filter their thinking through the lust of their flesh, their lust for the things of this world (like rebellious, hateful children, loving their own of the flesh, hating the restrainer of the flesh, siding with the social "felt needs" of carnal 'justification') and therefore always equate chastening as "spiritual abuse," as social abuse, and thus always equate it to the parent alienating the carnal child's nature from their desire for unity with the carnal world (for "isolating" the child from his carnal nature and thus preventing from 'discovering' his "full potential" with, i.e. within the world, i.e. alienating him from initiating and sustaining relationship with his "peers" of carnality), i.e. justifying himself before men, even doing so in the name of the Lord, or the church which embraces dialectic 'reasoning' for the 'purpose' of "growth." "Take heed therefore that the light which is in thee be not darkness." Luke 11:35.   Be not of dialectic 'reasoning,' justifying your sensuousness over and against His righteousness.   ''And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16: 15
    Karl Marx knew the pathway to take to get rid of faith in, love of, and obedience to the Heavenly Father. It was to first get rid of the God given authority of the earthly father, negate his right to chasten his children, negate his right to be the standard barer over his family, negate his right to restrain his children from their carnal nature and direct them in doing what is right. Even though his right might be wrong, the office of authority he rules in is right. Don't negate the office to get rid of the wrong. Philosophy, psychology, sociology is all about the negation of the office of the patriarchal father by focusing upon the wrong that is done by the man that is in that office. All that is of the world, the lust of the flesh, eyes, and pride of life is about the negation of the patriarch, i.e. usurping the office of authority of the father, i.e. negating the right of the father to chasten his children.
    To negate the office of the earthly father is to do so of the Heavenly Father. While Jesus came to divide the father from the son, divide between righteousness and sensuousness, he did not come to negate the authority of the father but rather came to place His Heavenly Fathers above both father and son. He did not negate the command that the "father must rule over his home well" and that "children must obey your parents, in the Lord."
    Doing the praxis of patricide (social-psychology) engenders the heresiarch ('change'), i.e. liberates and justifies the sensuousness (permissive, carnal nature) of "the children of disobedience." Doing the praxis of incest, justifies abomination (that which is of man) over and against righteousness (that which is of God). "Freud noted that … patricide and incest … are part of man's deepest nature." (Irvin D. Yalom, Theory and Practice and Group Psychotherapy) Freud believed that the father could stay around (join in or at least tolerate his children's praxis of incest―the "tolerance of ambiguity") as long as he no longer functioned as a traditional father figure, demanding his way, insisting that his children obey his commands, do his will without questioning him first, but willingly let them evaluate his commands according to their sensuous wills and challenge his authority, doing their will, whenever it is "sense perceived" as being 'right' in their own eyes (the fathers will being 'irrational' in the children's sensuous eyes and therefore the father and his commands as being 'irrelevant' in a "rapidly 'changing,'" i.e. sensuousness, stimulus-response engendered world).
    In these last days you will see an increase of "Christians" justifying the apostate church, following after "ministers" and "ministries" which appeal to their sensuousness, i.e. justify their resentment to the chastening (which comes with righteousness). Without the chastening there is no "peaceful fruit of righteousness," there is no father's authority, there is then only the father's wrath upon "the children of disobedience," wrath upon those who (foolishly) sense perceive themselves as being righteous in their own eyes as they do abominable things, i.e. whoring after the things of the world, lusting after the approval of men. It is here that the great deceiver is at his "best," turning the children against the father by helping them 'rationally' justify their sensuous desires. Through dialectic 'reasoning' man justifies his carnal nature. Remember, Jesus was all about His Heavenly Father, who will kill you (consume you in fire) if your are not dead to yourself, dead to your carnal nature, and alive in His Only begotten son, Jesus Christ, alive in His righteousness.
    The Holy Spirit was sent to comfort us in three things: 1) the world is (you are) condemned for its (your) sin of disobedience against the Fathers will, 2) righteousness is only of the Father, revealed to us in Christ's obedience to His Heavenly Fathers will, you can only be saved from damnation by righteousness which can only be found in Christ―returning to His Father having obeyed him in all things―imputed by Him to you by your faith in Him, and 3) Satan is judged for his disobedience. These three go hand in hand, 1) sin, i.e. you justifying your nature, 2) righteousness, in Christ's obedience to His Father in all things, and 3) judgment, of Satan and of all who are of Satan, who praxis disobedience to the will of the Father, i.e. who will spend eternity in hell no matter how "nice" they think they are in this world (justified in their eyes and the eyes of the world).
    "Spiritual abuse" is just another term used by social-psychologists who, like Satan, hate the Heavenly Father, i.e. hate doing his will, and therefore hate the earthly father who demands that they do his will which goes counter to our will. "Quivering daughters" are those who, along with Satan, justify themselves according to their lust for the things of this world, wanting to do their will, in defiance to the Fathers will as well. Both are of the spirit of antichrist, of Satan, expressing his hate of the father's authority over the children. The courts today, funded upon dialectic 'reasoning,' are out to destroy the will of the father, the office of the father as given to the world by God, so that the will of the world, the will of the Antichrist can have his way, his dialectic way. Child Protection Services ("the children of disobedience") base their 'drive' and their 'purpose' upon dialectic 'reasoning,' that is, the negation of righteousness (which can only come through the chastening of the father upon his children when they are disobedient), from the face of the world. Though they have their day in this life, they will have their day of reckoning when they face the "wrath of God upon the children of disobedience," in the judgment to come. "Every one that is proud in heart is an abomination to the LORD: though hand join in hand, he shall not be unpunished." Proverbs 16:5